Would (or was) a trial really be necessary?

[Emperor Napoleon]

In the following examples, I'll pose certain individuals as "no brainers" as far as would a trial even be necessary (or should have been necessary if it already happened) I got the idea when I saw a tabloid headline that "new evidence" proves O.J. was "guilty". Duh.

OJ Simpson killed his wife and her companion

Adolph Hitler didn't like jews

Bill Clinton suspected of marital infidelity

Michael Jackson is a perverted whacko

Bill Gates is greedy

Ronald Reagan no longer as sharp as he used to be

Liberace believed to have been gay

Madonna suspected of being promiscuous

The Pope is religious

Julia Child likes to cook

John Candy liked to eat

FDR enjoyed being president

JFK may have been a womanizer

Next....

[LanDroid]

Trials are never necessary, you are presumed innocent until accused.